Ramblin' with Roger

Call the police; voter ID

I’ve been pondering this topic pretty much since I got booted from jury duty on a trial for a police officer who had allegedly been assaulted.

Yes, I DO think being part of the police is inherently much more dangerous than what I do, what most people do. And it’s not just going after the bad guys, such as when two Los Angeles cops were killed during a shooting spree. I found recent cases where they were targeted rather disturbing, such as the New York City cops assaulted by a hatchet-wielding man.

You may have heard about Eric Frein, a survivalist who is accused of shooting and killing a Pennsylvania State Police officer, Bryon Dickson, and wounding Trooper Alex Douglass in an ambush September 12 outside the Blooming Grove state police barracks in Pike County, PA. He has fortunately been captured, seven weeks later. What you may not have read about is the man who was repeatedly mistaken for Frein. His allegation of rough treatment, unfortunately, rang true with me.

I was oddly happy to see a local cop acting badly, and the citizen involved being white. That’s because it removes the racial stereotypes; you’ll still see them in the comments to the video. That cop has resigned. Saratoga County, BTW, is one of the more well-to-do counties in the state, certainly in the Albany metro area.

This will tie in, eventually: a friend sent me an article Texans Slam Voter ID Law: ‘Now That It’s Happened To Me, I’m Devastated’. An “84-year-old grandmother who lives in an assisted-living facility in Austin, Texas, has voted in every major election in her life since she became eligible. But ..she couldn’t get the right identification…” Women who have ID under different names are particularly vulnerable.

“Critics of the law estimated that up to 750,000 people in Texas wouldn’t have sufficient ID and would need to get an election certificate to vote. Yet between June 2013 and the week leading up to Tuesday’s midterms, only 371 certificates had been issued…” Since these IDs are expensive, the purchase of same would amount to a poll tax, which is in violation of the 24th Amendment to the US Constitution.

The linkage here is that people often are oblivious to the wrongs that take place, sometimes under the presumption of legal authority, and believe it’s no big deal, until it affects them personally. My friend was really ticked about this in the voter ID case. I tend to think that it’s just human nature to think a problem is “theirs”, until it becomes “yours.”

Office JEOPARDY!

What was originally the Houston Oilers is today this NFL team.

There has been some interdepartmental game of the TV show Jeopardy going on around here. I was invited to join by this guy, not in my department, who told the organizer “Alex” that I’m really smart; thanks for the pressure. I wonder if “Alex” knows I was once on the real JEOPARDY?

Here are some of the rules.
* All the answers and questions come from the Jeopardy Desk calendar of the current date.
* Don’t cheat. NO looking at the desk calendar, NO looking up the answer anywhere (i.e. internet, dictionary, etc), NO discussing or giving it away with anyone.
* The Answer must be in the form of a question or you will lose points
* Don’t argue the answer. “Alex” will go only by what is on the desk calendar. If you have a problem with that, write the desk calendar people.
* Results are posted each day so that you know your standing.
* Spelling does not count; however, it does have to phonetically resemble the answer so “Alex” can give you points.
* Only those with positive points can play Final Jeopardy.
* Jeopardy will only be played on working days.

There are 17 players.

Play along and see how many points you’d get, WITHOUT looking it up.

Today’s Answer is worth $200 and the category is: Sports Talk
The Jeopardy game answer is: These two National Basketball Association teams play in the Staples Center.

I know this straight off. Those two teams in Los Angeles.

What are the Lakers and the Clippers?

Eight-way tie for first place.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $600 and the category is: Sports Talk
The Jeopardy game answer is: Forty-Two-Pound polished stones with a handle on top are slid on ice in this sport.

I’ve watched the Winter Olympics several times, and know a guy who used to play locally.

What is curling?

Still an eight-way tie
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1000 and the category is: Sports Talk
The Jeopardy game answer is: What was originally the Houston Oilers is today this NFL team.

Sad, but I’m pretty expert at the moves of Major League Baseball and NFL teams. NHL relocations might trip me up.

What are the (Tennessee) Titans?

Four-way tie for first.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1200 and the category is: Dramas
The Jeopardy game answer is: In the 15th Century, this alliterative type of play dealing with Jesus’ crucifixion could take 3 days to complete.

I used to get invitations to go to Europe to see these; never did it.

What is a Passion play?

Alone in first place by $1000. To my surprise, only one other person got it, and it wasn’t one of the co-leaders.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1000 and the category is: 5-Letter the Better
The Jeopardy game answer is: This five-letter coffee flavor comes from a Red Sea port in Yemen where coffee was exported.

I knew not drinking coffee would come back to bite me. Nothing is coming to mind. No guess, for getting it wrong costs points.

What is a mocha?

Lead cut to $200, $3000 to $2800 for 3 others.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $400 and the category is: Vice Precedents
The Jeopardy game answer is: She was the first woman nominated for Vice President by a major party.

Funny, but her name briefly left me. It knew it was 1984, I know she was on Walter Mondale’s ticket, I knew she was short, blonde, Italian. She’s now deceased. FINALLY it came to me.

Who was Geraldine Ferraro?

Maintain a $200 lead over 2 opponents, but 2 others are only $1000 back, with three more $1200 behind.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1200 and the category is: Vice Precedents
The Jeopardy game answer is: He was the first Vice President to assume the Presidency upon the death of a President.

I knew this instantly. William Henry Harrison’s veep was elevated a month after the 1841 inauguration.

Who was John Tyler?

I have $4600, and my nearest opponent has $3600, with two others at $3200. BTW, there are 4 people at $0, and two less than zero.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $200 and the category is: Economic Terms
The Jeopardy game answer is: Two-word term for business between 2 countries unhindered by governmental restrictions like tariffs or quotas.

I was home sick that day, so that’s my explanation for not knowing this. I kept thinking “bilateral agreement,” but wasn’t feeling confident. I passed. And a good thing.

What is free trade? (It was the TWO countries that bugged me; NAFTA is among THREE countries, e.g.)

I still have $4600, and my nearest opponents have $3600, $3400 and $3200.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $600 and the category is: Economic Terms
The Jeopardy game answer is: This term is from the Greek for “one” and “to sell”.

Well, one is mono. But I thought polis meant city, poly had to do with sides of a shape. Still what else could be “one seller”? Took a chance.

What is a monopoly?

A $1400 lead.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1000 and the category is: Economic Terms
The Jeopardy game answer is: It’s the study of large-scale or general economic factors, a country’s total economic activity.

Watching the show, sometimes stuff sticks.

What is macroeconomics?

With $6200, an $1800 lead.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $400 and the category is: TV
The Jeopardy game answer is: On January 22, 2010, this late night host said goodbye to NBC after 17 years on the network.

With a big lead, I got careless and guessed Jay Leno, when he left (for the last time), much later.

Who is Conan O’Brian?

I have $5800; second place is $4400, third is $4200, fourth is $2400, so it’s really a three-person contest right now.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1200 and the category is: TV
The Jeopardy game answer is: He won a Golden Globe for playing himself playing a hockey coach in Showtime’s Episodes.

Don’t know, so didn’t guess.

Who is Matt LeBlanc? (Oh, the guy from Friends; if I were to have taken a wild guess, it would have been him.)

Top three stay the same, though someone got it right and is up to $3000 for fourth place.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $600 and the category is: States by Cities & Towns
The Jeopardy game answer is: Medicine Lodge, Sublette, Leavenworth.

There’s a famous prison in Leavenworth, Kansas. My question: is there another Leavenworth? I take the chance.

What is Kansas?

Correct.
Coming up: the last question before the final.

I have $6400, followed by $5000, $4200, $3000, $2600, $2400. The rest have $1800 or less, including 6 with zero or less.
***

Today’s Answer is worth $1000 and the category is: States by Cities & Towns
The Jeopardy game answer is: Ville Platte, Opelousas, Plaquemine.

The scoring now affects my play. If I’m wrong, and 2nd place person is right, I could lose the lead. But if I’m right, maybe I won’t have to bet so much in the Final. I actually have no specific knowledge, but they all sound French, which suggests Louisiana. And doesn’t Opelousas SOUND like Louisiana? Or Mississippi?

What is Louisiana?

(Crosses fingers, and hopes that those French-sounding names didn’t deceive me; they did not!)

I have $7400, followed by $5000, $4200, $4000, $2600, $2400
***
Now it’s Final JEOPARDY!
Alex gives the category and nothing else. Based on this, we need to place a wager with the amount of money we have. We get the final Jeopardy answer the next day.

The Final Jeopardy Category is: 19th Century Literature. This is not my favorite topic. I can’t keep the Bronte sisters straight and haven’t read a great deal in the category.

I have, really, only two choices. One is to bet nothing, and make one of the three people with $4000 or more get the answer correct. The other is to bet enough to win, $2601 or more, get it right, and it doesn’t matter WHAT they do. I opt for the latter, wagering $2700.
***

Friday you all sent me a wager based on this Category: 19th Century Literature
Your answer to this category is: In an 1877 novel, Mrs. Gordon initially suggests the name Ebony for this title character.

“Remember, if you wagered nothing ($0) then your money stays whether you answer or don’t answer. If you did not wager your total will automatically become your wager. If you wagered and you answer the question you will either gain or lose whatever you wagered based on whether or not you answer the question correctly.”

I have NO idea who Mrs. Gordon is. But ebony is black, so I took a guess.

Do you have a guess? I mused about a character that looked like black wood.

What is Black Beauty? (Talk about your educated guesses.)

If I have ever read that book, I don’t remember.

This turned out to be CORRECT.

And the October Jeopardy winner is…moi!

I had $10,100, followed by $10,000, $8000, $4200, $3600, $2000, $1199 and $400. Betting nothing would have put me in third place. Getting it wrong, in this instance, would ALSO have put me in third place.
***
In the next round, I ask “Alex” to invite some of my office colleagues. It should be a real challenge to defend.

The case against The Case Against Liberal Compassion

This is some hope for you liberals who are feeling a bit… down after November 4.

Somehow, I have received in the (snail) mail the current (October 2014) issue of Imprimis. The article, The Case Against Liberal Compassion by William Voegeli, the Senior Editor of Claremont Review of Books, arrived right after the 2014 midterm elections. He attacks “the five big program areas that make up our welfare state.”

Basically, it’s the same old trope about liberals using other people’s money to do good. He uses the Affordable Care Act, and specifically the disastrous rollout of the Obamacare website as “proof”, ignoring the value of the actual program to the previously unemployed.

Of course, he does not once mention the major “welfare state,” corporate welfare. Even FORBES magazine, no liberal bastion, asked this year, Where Is The Outrage Over Corporate Welfare? Not to mention the cover-up of economic malfeasance.

In fact, I believe that it would be a very good thing to reduce the number of working families who are on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which I knew as Food Stamps. Ultimately, the government is supplementing Wal-Mart and McDonalds and those other businesses providing less than livable wages to their employees, expanding the welfare state.

But rather than creating a blow-by-blow response, for which I haven’t the energy, I recommend to you the Weekly Sift’s Republicans have a story to tell. We’re stuck with facts. It does not actually deal with the Imprimis article, but was, rather, an antidote to it for me.

Everything the Democrats support is on the wrong scale: We want to raise the minimum wage, and subsidize your health insurance, and pay women the same as men, and cut back the war on minor drugs, and create jobs building infrastructure, and put a little less carbon in the air. All good stuff…

What the current Democratic strategy misses is precisely the caring-about-things-that-don’t-directly-affect-you that the Republican story inspires…

It may also provide some hope for you liberals who are feeling a bit… down after November 4.

Ultimately, though, I’m convinced that it’s not just the expenditure of government money that is at issue. That would not explain the increasing number of municipalities that are criminalizing the hungry and the homeless, because it would not “look good.” This made national news. This does not involve government, except as an agent of non-compassion.

Meanwhile, newly-reelected Wisconsin Scott Walker wants jobless and food stamp recipients to face drug testing, an exercise in other states, such as Florida, that is not only demeaning but actually costs more to do than the savings from cutting off drug users; a lousy use of the public dollar.

So, yes, I’ll still accept the liberal mantle. Unlike the straw horse argument by Voegeli, I DO value the implementation of efficiency. Too often, though, those “efficiencies” are implemented to either line the pockets of the connected or obfuscate the real problems.

I’ll opt for compassion.

World War I doesn’t get its props

Those partitions after World war I have geopolitical implications to this day.

I was reading about World War I trench poetry remembered in comics anthology, and it hit me how relatively little most Americans know about the first World War (1914-1918), the “War to end all wars,” as someone put it, terribly incorrectly.

And it’s not its remoteness in time (1914-1918). We’re in the midst of the sesquicentennial of the American Civil War (1861-1865), with a pretty fair breakdown of every important battle.

As the article noted: “Of the two, World War II may be the one explored more often in pop culture…” Indeed, Tom Brokaw’s book title, The Greatest Generation, has been adopted as truth about those post-Depression young soldiers from the US going off to war after Pearl Harbor.

…but World War I… was important as well… More than 16 million people were killed, the war began an era of industrialized warfare, and it caused the redrawing of the map of Europe and the Near East.

Those partitions have geopolitical implications to this day.

Read about the Christmas 1914 truce HERE and HERE.

Shooting Parrots wrote about tunnel master John Norton-Griffiths and Alf Price, who punched a 19-year-old Prince Wilhelm in the nose. Also, Charles à Court Repington may have named the war, back in 1920.

Back in June, Jaquandor noted A Century since the Conflagration.

Of course, what’s now known as Veterans Day commemorates the end of World War I. It’s Remembrance Day in other countries and used to be called Armistice Day. Armistice is such a quaint word.

There’s some melancholy song on the first Paul Simon solo album called Armistice Day.

Who’s your favorite?

Writer Ken Levine did this, picking his favorite performer for a variety of roles. I can do that. Who is your favorite:

Felix & Oscar? I saw the television show, with Tony Randall and Jack Klugman first. The movie, with Lemmon and Matthau was great. But the room for the characters to develop through over 100 episodes on TV makes Tony & Jack my favorites. I did enjoy the short-lived version with Ron Glass as Felix and Demond Wilson as Oscar. Always wondered what the Sally Struthers/Rita Moreno version was like. Just read that ” Matthew Perry will be starring, co-writing, and executive-producing a remake…[which] will start airing in midseason 2015 on CBS. Perry will play Oscar Madison, a known slob; the role of his clean freak roomie Felix Unger will be portrayed by Thomas Lennon.”

James Bond? I STILL have not seen in a theater a James Bond movie. I’ll pick Sean Connery, because I did see some of his films on TV.

Superman? I suppose it’s Christopher Reeve, the guy from the movies c. 1978. Though George Reeves on the TV, and even the Fleisher cartoons voiced by Bud Collyer were under consideration.

Batman? (Michael Keaton? Really?) Sure, why not Michael Keaton, if only because he was better than I expected. And he was in the only movies I saw, except for the one with Adam West.

Lois Lane? Terri Hatcher from Lois and Clark, though Noel Neill from the early TV show also gets consideration.

Sherlock Holmes? The current TV show with Jonny Lee Miller

Dr. Who? I only watched the Tom Baker period with anything approaching regularity.

Darrin Stephens? Dick York, the original husband on Bewitched.

Hawkeye? Again, years of playing a character, in this case for over a decade, gives Alan Alda a real advantage over Donald Sutherland.

Host of THE PRICE IS RIGHT? While I had admiration for both Bill Cullen and Dennis James, and I’ve only seen Drew Carey a few times, I’ll go with Bob Barker, the long-time host.
***
Who else could we compare?

Alex Trebek has been doing it for the last 30 years, and I’ve gotten used to him. But I liked the jovial Art Fleming as host of JEOPARDY!, and he appears in the Weird Al video.

Clearly, I’ve spent WAY more time with the original Star Trek cast than the newcomers (seen only the first film of the reboot), so that’d be no contest, thus far. BTW, those are the Captains Kirk above.

Best presidential pair with a common surname: Roosevelt over Adams, I reckon. Don’t think Harrison, Johnson or Bush are really in the running.

One could take on music groups:
Which Van Halen lead singer? David Lee Roth
Genesis with or without Peter Gabriel? Each has its qualities
Which iteration of Fleetwood Mac? Ditto, though a lesser bands sans Christine McVie
Which group of Temptations? I actually preferred them after David Ruffin left and was replaced by Dennis Edwards before Eddie Kendrick left, the beginning of the psychedelic soul period.
Which Beatles drummer, Pete Best or Ringo Starr? OK, I was kidding with the last one.

Give me more!