Stephen Miller as Roy Cohn

believer in The Great Replacement Theory

I was talking with someone about the recent elections, as one does, but I was bemoaning Stephen Miller’s selection as chief of staff.  Someone asked me why. Memo to self: not everyone keeps up with this political stuff the way I do. So, if you don’t know who he is, here are some pieces on Stephen Miller.

Nine years ago, The Daily Show shared Profiles in Tremendousness about the White House senior advisor. More recently, the show presented Sucking Out the Blood of American Democracy, explaining how his views on the world have been around for decades.

Katie Couric quotes djt from his recent 60 Minutes interview. “He thought his deportation policy was ‘too tough,’ noting immigrants who’d been in the country ten-plus years without committing any crimes or were paying ‘good taxes.’ ‘A lot of people would say that it’s great. But a lot of people think it’s too tough,’ he said. It’s an oddly timed revelation, given he has just made Stephen Miller, the architect of those draconian policies, his chief of staff.“

BBC: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sources told CBS that in recent weeks officials have been instructed to aim for about 2,700 arrests of illegal immigrants per day, an increase from an earlier 2,000 daily arrest target.

Ruthless loyalty

This week, the New York Times article There’s A New Roy Cohn in Town. Compare and contrast: “‘Where’s my Roy Cohn?’ [djt] cried out early in his first term in the White House. Mr. Cohn, the lawyer and fixer who mentored [him] during his ascent through New York real estate — and who taught him never to back down, never to apologize, and always to threaten opponents with multi-million-dollar lawsuits — was then dead for 31 years. [He] clearly longed for his ruthless loyalty and his abrasive, no-holds-barred defiance of the American establishment.”

RELATED: Blogger buddy Nik describes the new book, American Scoundrel: Roy Cohn’s Dark Journey From Joe McCarthy To Donald Trump by Kai Bird and Susan Goldmark.

NYT: “In the wake of the Republican Party’s midterm calamity, most politicians would tack toward conciliation. [FOTUS] instead did what he was taught: He doubled down, replacing Ms. Wiles with Stephen Miller, the dedicated consigliere and attack dog who was the architect of some of his most divisive policies. Forty years after his mentor’s death, he found his Roy Cohn.”

The Atlantic: One person familiar with [FOTUS’s] decision to elevate Miller told us that he wants somebody who “will crack skulls,” adding that [FOTUS] “doesn’t want to be reined in.”

Call it what it is

If you didn’t know how horrific Stephen Miller is, it may be because “major media outlets sanitize [his] white nationalist ideas. Judd Legum’s Substack:

“The Washington Post described Miller as someone who ‘has long railed against political correctness’ and ‘a prominent voice on issues such as race, gender and immigration.’ The Wall Street Journal said Miller has ‘zealous views.’ The New York Times noted that Miller is ‘a perennial target of critics of Mr. Trump, who have highlighted his right-wing views.’ The AP cast Miller as ‘an immigration hardliner and a bombastic critic of Democrats.’ Reuters called Miller ‘caustic and uncompromising.’

“These are all euphemisms for Miller’s actual beliefs, which nearly every major media outlet neglected to state in plain terms. The record is clear: Miller has repeatedly promoted white nationalist ideas.

“A Popular Information review of 105 articles about Miller’s appointment in 36 mainstream publications — including CNN, NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, CNBC, NPR, Newsweek, Axios, The Atlantic, The New Yorker, Time, and Semafor — found only two (USA Today and Politico) used the term ‘white nationalist.’ Even those two articles attributed the description to an outside group or ‘critics,’ rather than stating it as a fact.”

Tell it like it is

Per the Weekly Sift, which also contains a great cartoon of Stephen Miller appropriate to the discussion: “Here’s the headline in Le Monde, a leading French publication: ‘Stephen Miller, reactionary ideologue and white supremacist, promoted head of Trump administration‘. Contrast that direct truth-telling with this fascist-friendly characterization in the NYT:

“Mr. Miller has been the driver of the president’s most muscular actions, including the use of increasingly hostile tactics to capture immigrants across the country and the bombing of small boats in the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific Ocean that he and Mr. Trump declared constituted a foreign invasion.”

Legum: “In an October 10 post on X, Miller promoted ‘remigration,’ the mass removal of non-European immigrants and their descendants. It is a ‘white supremacist policy concept,’ according to the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism.” 

In New York Magazine, Ed Kilgore called Miller’s promotion “a chilling sign… And that may be the scariest thing of all about his new base of power: He has two more years to act on his deep belief in the Great Replacement Theory. This is the idea that traitorous liberals are deliberately destroying the country through a conspiracy to drown native white Americans in a sea of shiftless immigrants who trade illegal votes for welfare benefits and the opportunity to commit crimes. [FOTUS] talks about this nightmare scenario all the time as part of his demagogic pitch to the MAGA base. But for Miller, it’s an article of faith.”

A book

The Borowitz Report is touting the book Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and the White Nationalist Agenda. “In her new book, Hatemonger, journalist Jean Guerrero provides a full portrait of this Nosferatu of the West Wing…. Jean Guerrero has the emails.” –The Bulwark. One could order it here, with none of the proceeds going to Bezos. 

 

Could it be The Abecedarian Book?

Ugly Gerry

I received an email from Sue in response to my 2012(!) post  for ABC Wednesday titled G is for Gerrymander:

Hello, Roger! I came upon you and your blog while searching for a book that my partner recalls from his childhood. The book was a gift from his aunt who visited NYC around 1960. It was an alphabet book, and the letter “G” was for Gerrymander.

He proceeded to tell me the history of the word gerrymander(ing) in very much the same way that you have. In any event, I am wondering if you know the book I mentioned. If we knew the title, I could search, maybe on Abe’s List or one of those sites.

Sue – First of all, I am oddly pleased someone else out there is as passionate, or possibly geeky, about political science as I am.

I’ve been fascinated by gerrymandering since I discovered that the pronunciation of Edmund Gerry’s last name is DIFFERENT from the word:  “Gary” vs. “Jerry.”
I don’t know the book. But I did come across this: Ferguson, Charles W. (Charles Wright). 1964. The abecedarian book, Boston: Little Brown, which does have G is for Gerrymander: https://library.si.edu/image-gallery/109345. It sounds cool; I never owned it. 
The cover above is from The Abecedarian Book: “an alphabet book of big words for adults with the curiosity of children with the capacity of adults.” The illustrator was John Alcorn. I see the book is available at Abe’s Books for $15-$45. Ferguson also wrote Naked to Mine Enemies: The Life of Cardinal Wolsey, also available from Abe’s. 
In a similar vein, check out “Expressing Your Anger at Gerrymandering?” Ugly Gerry is a font series created from graphics of real Congressional districts. 

Sunday Stealing Searches for Meaning

When I was 25….

Photo taken 6 Nov 2025 in an office park outside of Troy, NY

Welcome to Sunday Stealing. Here we will steal all types of questions from every corner of the blogosphere. Our promise to you is that we will work hard to find the most interesting and intelligent questions. Cheers to all of us thieves!

The website A Life Untold poses questions crafted to gain new insights into your mother and/or father. This week we’re using them to learn more about you.

Meaningful Questions – The Blogger Searches for Meaning

1. If you could go back to any age, which would you choose and why?

I never know how to answer this. The first answer, I suppose, is 25. I had just started working at the Schenectady Arts Council after having bounced around the previous year in Charlotte (NC), Binghamton, NYC, and New Paltz (all NY).  I actually started the job six days before my birthday, and my new coworker Nancy gave me a little SWAT truck for my birthday. Meeting her connected me with a bunch of other folks, which led me to move to Albany and work at a comic book store, FantaCo.

The other was 37. I quit working at Empire Blue Cross on March 1, with no job prospects. I ended up working the 1990 Census and then going to library school at UAlbany.

2. If you could snap your fingers and change any single aspect of your life today, what would you change?

Definitely lose weight, which would make my left knee less sore.

What Is Success -Bonnie Raitt

3. Define a “good” or “successful” life.

I don’t know. But I’ve been obsessing over an October 5 interview Jon Stewart of The Daily Show did with Jacob Coxon, a former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who spoke out about the dangers of artificial intelligence

“The two discuss the future, AI-led utopia that tech companies are trying to sell us, the megalomania and riskiness that underlie the industry, and the terrifying capabilities Coxon witnessed while training AI models at Anthropic and OpenAI.”  

Will AI flow down to the middle class so no work is required and we can chill like George Jetson at work, with Rosie the Robot doing the cleaning at home?  How will the technology flow to developing countries? And what will give people meaning in life?

Ultimately, I think it will continue to be in community with others, engaging in art, music, intellectual pursuits. It is NOT “who has the most toys wins.”  

You’re Kind – Paul Simon

4. What’s the best compliment you’ve ever received?

The best? No clue. But here is a recent one. A woman I do not know introduced herself online; she is not a native speaker of English. She’s a shareholder in an AI company and has become increasingly interested in the future of artificial intelligence. She was also interested in and encouraging of the book review I was working on.

I wrote: “I loved the idea of the book I reviewed but the solutions, not so much. It is easier for me to talk about what I love, but it is an interesting muscle to excercise re: what you don’t love.”

She replied: “I just read your message and actually read it twice. There’s a lot of wisdom in what you said, and I feel like it applies to so many things in both our personal lives and our work.” 

Later that day, she commented, “Today, I shared your words with my friends and discovered that everyone had a different perspective. Each of them offered their own interpretation of what the quote meant to them.”

I was just answered a question. It wasn’t particularly profound, but itf it were meaningful to her, then that’s great.   

5. What’s the most valuable thing your parents taught you?

My father taught me the love of music, while my mother shared her joy of numbers. I know 432 is divisible by 9 because the digits add up to 9. 

Thank you for playing! Please come back next week.

#1 Alternative Rock Hits for 1996

**** Surfers

These are the Alternative Rock Hits for 1996 that reached #1. This is the second of three Rock Charts; this one started in September 1988. The distinctions are fuzzy to me.

Swallowed – Bush, seven weeks at  #1; also #2 on the mainstream rock charts (M) for two weeks, and #27 as an album cut on the pop charts

Standing Outside A Phone Booth with Money in My Hand – Primitive Radio Gods, six weeks at #1. Also, #32 M, and #10 as an album cut on the pop charts.  I was largely unfamiliar with it. I love the sample from the 1964 B.B. King song “How Blue Can You Get

Champagne Supernova – Oasis, five weeks at #1. Also, #8 M, and #20 as an album cut on the pop charts. My working theory is that a number of folks own one Oasis album, and that it’s  (What’s The Story) Morning Glory? It is true of me.

Salvation – The Cranberries, four weeks at #1. Also #25 M and #21 as an album cut on the pop charts. Some folks thought the song was too preachy. I own the first three Cranberries albums. This song is from the third one, To the Faithful Departed.

Ironic – Alanis Morissette, three weeks at #1. Also #18 M and #4 pop.

Mother Mother – Tracy Bonham, three weeks at #1. Also #18 M and #32 as an album cut on the pop charts.

Pepper – Butthole Surfers, three weeks at #1. Also #19 M, and #26 as an album cut on the pop charts. The group has existed since 1981?  I continue to be mildly amused that, when I read aloud the word Butthole, my Microsoft Surface Laptop changes it to ****

What I Got – Sublime, three weeks at #1. Also #11 M and #29 as an album cut on the pop charts. 

The rest are #1 for one week

1979 – Smashing Pumpkins. Also #1 for two weeks M, and #12 pop.

Counting Blue Cars – Dishwalla. Also #2 M for four weeks and #15 pop. 

Who You Are– Pearl Jam. Also #5 M and #31 pop.

I’ve seen this scam before

“a bit of discretion”

I’ve seen this scam before. I got an email from a First Presbyterian pastor. But not one of MY First Presbyterian ministers, but a guy in another city.
Good Morning,
I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to ask if you’re open to communicating via email.  I have a task I’d like to entrust to you, and it requires a bit of discretion. Please let me know as soon as you’re able. I’ll be waiting to hear from you.
Many blessings in Christ,
[name and title, plus a thumbnail photo]
Out of curiosity, I reply:
Warily, I’m saying OK.
The “pastor” writes:
Thank you for your response. I’m a little busy this week, and I have been working on incentives. I aim to surprise some of our members with gift cards today. This should be Confidential until they all have the gift cards in their email, as it’s a surprise, and you will keep one for yourself too. Please, let me know via email if you can help purchase them now, so I can tell you what to get in the next email.
Many blessings in Christ,
Warm regards,
{name and title]

I looked up the church. There was a pastor by that name there, and it is his picture, but the URL included the church name.org rather than Gmail.com.

I wrote to them:
Hello. I am a member of First Pres Albany, and I received this obviously fraudulent message.
Not coincidentally, some of our parishioners received a similar message, purportedly from our pastors.

The real church replied:
Thank you!! I will be sure to report to our team.

BTW, in an e-blast, my church noted that our pastors “would never reach out that way randomly for assistance. Thanks to all who notified them of the problem.”
Previously

I got the exact same email a while ago, but I forgot who it was from. 

A few years ago, I received an email from another preacher I know. This message suggested that “he” had been traveling – which he, in fact, did often – and he was stuck out of the country after being robbed.
I contacted a mutual acquaintance, who assured me the message was bogus. While I expected as much, the verification comforted me.
The Royal Scam – Steely Dan