My wife gave me the novel Mona’s Eyes by the French art historian Thomas Schlesser for Christmas 2025. A few months later, I asked her why. She thought it sounded interesting; I had not heard of it, honestly. Then, I was obliged to do a book review.Seeking an approach
“I feel that the plot was an excuse for Schlesser to showcase his knowledge about art… ending with an anticlimactic conclusion.” The ending was a bit predictable.
“What I liked. The concept of the book was enjoyable – short chapters, each focused on a specific piece of art, with Mona and her grandfather analyzing and drawing life lessons from them. Schlesser’s passion for art is evident. The way he describes the paintings and sculptures is vivid and really makes one see, with the mind’s eyes, what most of them look like in real life. The book also includes photographs of the artworks, allowing readers to reference and study them in (more or less) detail after reading the descriptions.
“The art and history lover in me also rejoiced at the trivia that Henry inserts into the conversations – bits and pieces about various artistic movements, about the lives of the artists, and connections between the various artworks in the novel.”
I totally agreed with the positive elements described.
OTOH
The complaints, and there were many, include “the plot felt forced and filled with insignificant details that did nothing to move the story along.” I was less bothered by this than some. Sure, there are threads in Mona’s school life that weren’t resolved. Nor was I bothered by Mona’s preternatural wisdom, if only because I bought into the mystical reason why.
The fact that Henry and Mona were lying to Mona’s parents for nearly a year was addressed, albeit obliquely.
I did have problems, though Mona’s dad was almost certainly an alcoholic, which he seemed to almost magically overcome when some tchotchkes he found at the curiosity shop sold; there’s a backstory about those pieces. And his new project suddenly brightened his outlook. In many ways, Mona’s parents were ciphers.
Here’s a piece from a Reddit feed titled, “Mona’s Eyes” is an outrageously repetitive art history book disguised as fiction (my manifesto).” A key paragraph: “Chapter after chapter after chapter. Don’t believe me? Read it. I can’t take it anymore. The fact that I’m expected to recommend this art history textbook disguised in clumsy fiction drag to innocent customers is crazy. Every time I do, I feel like I’m spitting in their food and picking their pocket.” Barnes & Noble selected the tome as Book of the Year.
Split decision
I’ve never seen so many one-star reviews with DNF (did not finish). I usually think that a one-star review without finishing the book is unfair, but I get it in this case.
Ultimately, I’m glad I read the book for the discussion of the art, which helped me see it in a fresh way. Incidentally, there is The Mona’s Eyes Reader’s Companion: Week by Week Guide to All 52 Artworks, Life Lessons & Discussion Questions by Claire Beaumont
But Mona’s Eyes is probably not a great NOVEL.
This is the basis of my oral book review at the Albany Public Library on Tuesday, April 14.
Welcome to Sunday Stealing. Here we will steal all types of questions from every corner of the blogosphere. Our promise to you is that we will work hard to find the most interesting and intelligent questions. Cheers to all of us thieves!
Here are the #1 pop hits for 1 week in 1966. These were on the Billboard charts, which is the usual standard I’ve been using.
Our Hampshire College graduation journey started with my sister Leslie flying overnight (Th/Fri from San Diego to Albany. Then, on the morning of Saturday, May 16, my wife drove the three of us to the Amherst-area college.
I’ve been really bad about chronicling the 2025-2026 Cap Rep/Proctors season. Part of it is that there is often little time from seeing the production to the end of the run. The other factor is that when I see a play or musical I don’t love, it’s harder for me to write.