LONG-time blogger Dustbury asks a question for this round of Ask Roger Anything:
If a purely arbitrary decision was handed down to the effect that you could no longer remain in upstate New York, where would you first consider going?
Not moving to anywhere there is no fresh water, so desert states such as Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico are definitely out. California – well, is the big earthquake still coming? I’d like to be out of direct range of hurricanes, which eliminates Florida, not that I wouldn’t have passed on it for other reasons; and the parts of the states on the Gulf coast and southern part of the Atlantic are unlikely.
Not Texas, because Texas is Texas.
I’m wary of being in tornado alley, which seems to encompass much of the center of the country from Oklahoma to Ohio.
Places I had considered before I’m now rethinking; I worry about Washington and Oregon after the Fukishama nuclear plant meltdown in Japan, maybe not enough to eliminate them, but it’s a factor. I wouldn’t pass on all the states along the flood-prone Mississippi River, but any place that’s flooded in the last 15 years, I can imagine flooding again.
I hear the Deep South is more enlightened than it used to be; not sure I’d want to move there.
I REALLY liked Madison, Wisconsin when I was there in 1988. Always appreciate the state’s progressive tradition. Don’t love the current governor, though.
Do I want somewhere warmer? Certainly NOT colder, which eliminates Minnesota and Maine.
Ultimately, it would be either in a small college town, or a larger college town with decent mass transit in New England, but probably not Connecticut, which often feels like suburbia. Rhode Island is a possibility. I’m fond of Northampton, Massachusetts.
My pick, all things being equal, is southern Vermont. After all, Vermont was part of New York, before it was broken off to become the 14th state. Both New York and Vermont have a maple syrup tradition. And, in spite of damage from some recent hurricanes, both tend to be out of hurricane alley.