On Black Friday, my wife and I went to the Spectrum Theatre in Albany to see the 1:50 showing of the new Steven Spielberg movie Lincoln. It was sold out! That hasn’t happened to me since the original Star Wars. We bought tickets for the 3:15 show and were advised to be back by 2:45.
We bought some hot chocolate, then went to a charming little toy store/food emporium. By the time we got back to the theater, there was this long line. I assumed it was to buy tickets; no, the 3:15 was SOLD OUT, and the line was for the ticket holders, which included us, fortunately. Also, the 6:25 showing that night also sold out, we noted as we left.
I was glad to have seen a recent interview with Doris Kearns Goodwin, author of Team of Rivals, the Lincoln book upon which the movie was based. I wasn’t as surprised by the relatively high-pitched voice that Lincoln (the extraordinary Daniel Day-Lewis) had. All that he had lived through, the secession, the war, and the death of a son all wore on him so that General Grant said that he had aged ten years in the past 12 months. Yet, despite all that, he could be very funny!
I wonder if the 10% of the critics on Rotten Tomatoes who DIDN’T like the movie thought it was boring, etc. I think they may have had different expectations. It is, above all, a political movie, based in the first four months of 1865. Lincoln has been re-elected President. A number of Democrats in the House of Representatives have been defeated, but are in a lame-duck session. Can Lincoln get the 13th Amendment, to abolish slavery, through the House? And how will that affect the chances for peace in that great civil war?
For the most part, it didn’t feel like a Spielberg movie. I can’t explain that exactly, except to note that the second scene in the movie, involving people quoting Lincoln, to Lincoln, did have a Spielberg “feel”.
Great appearance by Sally Field as a haunted Mary Todd Lincoln, a role she noted recently that she had to fight for; Lincoln was older than Mary, who he called Molly, but Day-Lewis is a bit younger than Field. Also, there were stellar roles by David Strathairn as William Seward, Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Stevens, and others. I must admit that the character James Spader played didn’t seem all that different from his role on Boston Legal.
Will this film become the definitive Lincoln biopic? It may very well do so. People cried, and applauded at the end of the film. I liked it a lot.
9 thoughts on “MOVIE REVIEW: Lincoln”
I checked the other day and it won’t open in New Zealand until January. These days, most movies have global release dates, but I bet the NZ distributor thought it would be “too American” or something. Sadly, I doubt even the (good) buzz will move that date up.
Sadly, it won’t open in New Zealand until January. These days, most movies have a global release date, but I bet the NZ distributors thought it was “too American” or something. I bet not even all the positive buzz will help move that date up.
I am so looking forward to this movie…I love the work of all the actors that are in it. Thanks for the review.
The critics complain that Lincoln in the movie is too short and played by an Englishman. I’ve got to admit that turned me off to the movie.
BTW, the Spectrum was the only busy place in Albany on Black Friday, a refuge from the malls, I guess.
Two and a half hours is too short? Yikes. Maybe it should have been called Lincoln’s Last Year, or something, because Lincoln is too expansive a title. But Day-Lewis is extraordinary, and i’m not sure what American actor could have pulled it off so well.
Are you saying Abraham Lincoln was two and a half hours tall? Man, I gotta go find my home planet, this one makes no sense at all.
I misreads you comment. I thought you said Lincoln was too short, meaning the movie. He didn’t look too short; he was, in relationship, to most of the other actors, impressive enough.
Definitely on my list to see before the end of the year! I’ve heard great reviews from the “lay people.”
Roger, the fault lies with that mean old lady who often makes me say things that are just plain wrong. You know, my Bad Grammar.